The Origins of Oppressionism
How a post–Cold War ideology emerged from the collapse of communism and the transformation of liberal democracy.
Read moreCancel culture, “Wokeism,” and the Gender Debates are not isolated Culture Wars but signs of a single ideology called Oppressionism. It divides society into oppressors and oppressed and rewrites justice around identity. This site traces its origins, explores how it works, and exposes its reach across culture, institutions, and law.
A clear, three-part introduction to Oppressionism.
How a post–Cold War ideology emerged from the collapse of communism and the transformation of liberal democracy.
Read moreHow Oppressionism operates as a system that redefines justice, freedom, and power from within liberal society.
Read moreThe blueprint that defines Oppressionism as a self-reinforcing ideology rooted in power, identity, and perpetual correction.
Read moreBeliefs at a glance. Hover a card to see a one-line summary.
Society is divided between oppressors and oppressed.
Power is the central fact of human relations.
Group identity determines moral and social position.
Neutrality is an illusion, and inaction is moral failure.
Knowledge and authority arise from identity and experience.
Unearned advantage carries moral responsibility.
Justice means correcting or reversing historical advantage.
Overlapping disadvantages amplify moral authority.
Words and symbols are instruments of power.
The blueprint that allows Oppressionism to operate as a leader-less, self-reinforcing ideology.
How Oppressionism functions through an internalized code that shapes perception, judgment, and behavior across society.
Read moreThe recurring script through which Oppressionism converts moral logic into coordinated social and institutional action.
Read moreThe decentralized network that enforces conformity and amplifies Oppressionism’s influence across institutions and culture.
Read moreTactics and tools at a glance. Hover a card to see a one-line summary.
Mobilised visibility and pressure used to impose compliance.
Using the courts to establish ideological precedent.
Internal procedures that punish deviation from doctrine.
Rewriting policies to embed ideological outcomes.
Restrict access to suppress dissenting voices.
Allocate opportunity and access according to identity.
Require explicit statements of ideological alignment.
Apply new moral or ideological standards to the past.
Withdraw access or participation on the grounds of psychological harm.
MORE COMING SOON...